Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 05:34
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 63.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 77% 144 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 984 87% 738 Pts	64-Core 2,704 167% 2,704 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 3252 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 207 Parallax 208 116% 186 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 188 Splatting 124 119% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,744 Write 1,426 Mixed 1,243 327% 1,471 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 39.6 158% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 93.9 DQ Mixed 64.2 69% 117 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 254%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 306GB free Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,537 Write 541 Mixed 792 209% 957 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 79.8 4K Mixed 42.4 141% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 86.7 87% 143 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 144%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 225GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22851 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4228 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 45 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4070 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 53 201864511516 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 130 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 30393356501 (F7) Unknown 100 100 953376116 (F8) Unknown 100 100 507234468	90.3% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 478 Mixed 473 108% 485 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 29.2 116% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 43.1 56% 100 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 190GB free Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5519 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5181 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 17 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5003 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 55 193274511387 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9133560403 (F7) Unknown 100 100 288034048 (F8) Unknown 100 100 125032981 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1936 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	70.3% Very good	Read 469 Write 277 Mixed 341 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 23.6 95% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 92.5 DQ Mixed 46.9 57% 103 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 99%
OCZ INTREPID 3700 240GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 179GB free Firmware: 1.5.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12181 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5632 (64) Unknown 100 100 3705952 (AB) Unknown 83 0 2823 (AE) Unknown 34 100 1944 (B8) Unknown 16 100 569 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 44 62 4069676 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3817 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5077 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 1762529065 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 91 100 2740 (D0) Spin buzz 1 100 54 (D2) Unknown 100 100 21617 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 547 (D5) Unknown 100 100 105 (D6) Unknown 100 100 442 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 29264 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 0 100 (F9) Unknown 100 100 9067 (FB) Unknown 100 100 16807	73.6% Very good	Read 465 Write 204 Mixed 288 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 25.4 120% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 69.3 73% 121 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 242203696 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6787 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3477307 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6405 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2733 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65537 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 74 56 471269402 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1379 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 16099 (C2) HDA temperature 26 44 42949672986 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -127530463918156 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15195332594 (F2) Unknown 100 253 29501975518	93% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 155 Mixed 149 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.17 86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 482GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 187 187 42969792871 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4494 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21876 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1455 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4881 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4881 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 214749741084 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.8% Excellent	Read 127 Write 165 Mixed 89.6 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.23 79% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	129% Outstanding	MC Read 50.7 MC Write 54.1 MC Mixed 49.5 147% 51.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 22.2 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 177%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $831

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16