Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 01 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6400-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
62.6% Good
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
64% 136 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 367
50% 365 Pts
64-Core 381
26% 381 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 124
Reflection 109
Parallax 132
32% 122 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 116
Splatting 78.3
29% 89.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 390
Mixed 403
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 23.4
131% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 103
122% 213 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
225GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 105
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.19
73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST31000521AS 1TB
174GB free
Firmware: CCA3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 65.3
Write 76.1
Mixed 93.9
60% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.49
106% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $874
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $203AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback