| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| System | HP EliteBook 8760w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1630 |
| Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130715 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 28 '18 at 22:10 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.9%
Good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
31% 227 Pts
|
9% 142 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 4000M
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.98
|
6.3%
Terrible
|
5% 9.26 fps
|
9% 10.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
27.3%
Poor
|
32% 42.7 MB/s
|
30% 0.27 MB/s
| |
|
|
44.9%
Average
|
43% 59.6 MB/s
|
57% 0.46 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.1%
Below average
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
51% 77.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 360 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8760w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples | 68x |
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 55x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples | 234x |
| Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples | 37x |
| FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples | 36x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $284 |