Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 134% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	60 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '18 at 04:54
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 76 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 983 87% 738 Pts	64-Core 2,707 168% 2,707 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 3252 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 189 Parallax 183 131% 178 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 180 Splatting 128 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1,920 Write 1,425 Mixed 1,194 335% 1,513 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 47.2 178% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 77.1 82% 140 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 254%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 306GB free Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,542 Write 541 Mixed 796 210% 959 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 44.6 153% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 108 108% 176 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 144%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 225GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22775 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4213 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 45 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4055 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 53 201864511518 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 130 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 30376239141 (F7) Unknown 100 100 952817808 (F8) Unknown 100 100 506375375	93.9% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 479 Mixed 484 110% 492 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 31.6 125% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 43.4 58% 106 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 190GB free Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5443 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5134 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 17 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4957 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 55 193274511389 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9120542636 (F7) Unknown 100 100 287610679 (F8) Unknown 100 100 122744834 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1936 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	76% Very good	Read 482 Write 326 Mixed 313 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 22.8 98% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 47.3 65% 123 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 99%
OCZ INTREPID 3700 240GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 179GB free Firmware: 1.5.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5585 (64) Unknown 100 100 3685920 (AB) Unknown 83 0 2823 (AE) Unknown 34 100 1930 (B8) Unknown 16 100 569 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 46 62 4069678 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3812 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5072 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 1761123706 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 90 100 2717 (D0) Spin buzz 1 100 53 (D2) Unknown 100 100 21617 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 547 (D5) Unknown 100 100 105 (D6) Unknown 100 100 442 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 29264 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 0 100 (F9) Unknown 100 100 9036 (FB) Unknown 100 100 16789	78.4% Very good	Read 467 Write 208 Mixed 288 71% 321 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 26.6 130% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 85.6 92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 227724096 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6690 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3472100 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6329 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2715 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65537 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 76 56 488112152 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1368 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 15879 (C2) HDA temperature 24 44 42949672984 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -128226248620117 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15190388150 (F2) Unknown 100 253 29490593994	91.9% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 156 Mixed 151 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.23 90% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 482GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 123 123 42982769145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4398 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21800 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1438 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4785 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4785 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 214749741083 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.1% Excellent	Read 131 Write 166 Mixed 145 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.2 89% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	166% Outstanding	MC Read 66.5 MC Write 67.5 MC Mixed 63.5 188% 65.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 43.1 SC Mixed 28 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 177%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $829

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16