Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 909
89% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 62
55% 66.1 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 54.4
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 1,105
Mixed 1,308
340% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 21.7
166% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 48.8
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 23.2
35% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
91GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 497
Mixed 500
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 44.8
163% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 105
100% 149 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
34GB free
Firmware: 9B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 485
Write 129
Mixed 158
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 9.87
88% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 28.3
60% 127 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 24.7
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 10.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback