Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7800X-$440
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
1-Core 133
2-Core 271
95% 202 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 899
91% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,093
73% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$399
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 203
Reflection 178
Parallax 198
53% 193 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 192
Splatting 125
54% 156 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 1,105
Mixed 1,308
340% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 21.7
166% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 48.8
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 23.2
35% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 207%
Great: 235%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$160
91GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 497
Mixed 500
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 44.8
163% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 105
100% 149 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
34GB free
Firmware: 9B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 485
Write 129
Mixed 158
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 9.87
88% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 28.3
60% 127 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 24.7
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 10.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback