Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101008
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '18 at 01:56
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 91.3 48% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 186 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 67 Parallax 65.9 51% 65.3 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 54.2 50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4926 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1466 (B1) Unknown 95 95 95 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 70 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32837543625	57.7% Above average	Read 263 Write 311 Mixed 226 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 18.9 88% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 16.1 20% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 435GB free, PID 2321 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 77.6 Mixed 74.3 96% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-880GA-UD3H Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	21x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	15x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	7x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	19x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16