Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	123.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.00GHz 745 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 136 59% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 549 48% 410 Pts	64-Core 1,310 81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 118 Parallax 111 93% 114 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 104 Splatting 106 85% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,543 Write 1,309 Mixed 1,332 311% 1,394 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 48.2 170% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 95.2 103% 175 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 283%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 448GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4340 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1765 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 99 99 167 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1989 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 50 36 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 512 (F1) Unknown 99 99 507 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3497	234% Outstanding	Read 1,970 Write 1,550 Mixed 1,701 387% 1,740 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 48.1 166% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 96.4 103% 173 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 373GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4661 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1948 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 9 (AE) Unknown 99 99 183 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1969 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 21 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 4608 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2803 (F2) Unknown 99 99 5369	232% Outstanding	Read 1,944 Write 1,543 Mixed 1,689 384% 1,725 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 47.5 165% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 95.8 102% 171 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 241%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 144GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9851 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4306 (B1) Unknown 95 95 165 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 141 (EB) Unknown 99 1 1208 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23197911258	96.6% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 487 Mixed 508 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 25.8 121% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 78.1 104% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-012.A02G 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 60.3 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 47.9 137% 47.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 16 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16