Dell DCS CS24-NV7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell DCS CS24-NV7 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 3CESL1
Memory	60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100928
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 22:22
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 2431 20 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU0-Socket F, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 61.6 29% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 251 20% 178 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vaseky V 800/64GB 60GB 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q092 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 236 Write 187 Mixed 218 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 4.47 42% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 8.33 20% 39.7 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 625GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 186 Mixed 170 133% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.33 103% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB 2,251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 438GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 115 Write 95.5 Mixed 102 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.38 97% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB 2,251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 335GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 115 Write 96 Mixed 104 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.38 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 72%
Toshiba Ext HDD 500GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 238GB free, PID b001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27.4 Mixed 13.1 28% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.19 63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16x4GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 4.7 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Dell DCS CS24-NV7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)