Hp-pavilion KJ376AA-A2L m8430f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KJ376AA-A2L m8430f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	36.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 15:52
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 27 2-Core 53.3 35% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 95.2 8-Core 94 13% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 97.2 6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 034F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 296.19 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.78 2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3750630AS 750GB-$207 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 320GB free Firmware: HP21 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 68743728 (03) Spinup time 93 85 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6809 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 60542505413 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19350 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 46 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4522 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032839 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 622133285 (C2) HDA temperature 37 48 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 18 68743728 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.9% Average	Read 77.5 Write 86.1 Mixed 24.2 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.28 67% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 60%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 291GB free Firmware: 08.0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 189 5458 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5773 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30097 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4351 (C2) HDA temperature 114 99 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.6% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 61.3 Mixed 22.1 36% 48.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.41 108% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%
Maxtor STM3200820AS 200GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 83 116307012 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5223 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 328295433 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23346 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5091 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 689373225 (C2) HDA temperature 41 50 77309411369 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 55 61956831 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.6% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 37.7 Mixed 22.3 24% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.34 72% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.31% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 5.96 Mixed 9.36 11% 9.69 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.008 16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.31% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion KJ376AA-A2L m8430f

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)