HP SG3-250SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP SG3-250SC  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AAF
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 09:22
Run Duration777 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 45.9
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 77.1
33% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 76.4
8-Core 81.2
10% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 79.6
5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 167
Mixed 142
119% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.22
111% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 85
Mixed 69.6
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.25
76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 3.66
Mixed 2.75
7% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.77
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
10% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 1.75
Mixed 4.38
8% 9.94 MB/s
4K Read 3.28
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.87
64% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback