Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '18 at 03:41
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 196 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 702 66% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.9% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 110 Parallax 94.2 83% 102 fps	MRender 96.7 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 99.1 80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 84GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4334637 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 138083198566464 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 50 90197590046 (C2) HDA temperature 30 50 90197590046 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4334637 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4334637 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4334637 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 60129542145 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294962195 (EA) Unknown 0 0 84 (F1) Unknown 0 0 84 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20 (F4) Unknown 99 99 3801123	65.7% Good	Read 505 Write 191 Mixed 243 68% 313 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 15.5 94% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 46.9 63% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9026729 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 115130893345254 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1899 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 234 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 53 1009320787997 (C2) HDA temperature 29 53 1009320787997 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9026729 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9026729 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9026729 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16712 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10305 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10305 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9022	46% Average	Read 264 Write 114 Mixed 151 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 13.6 84% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 72.3 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 28.3 40% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 73%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3TB free Firmware: D781 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 117 Mixed 94 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 3.07 4K Write 5.43 4K Mixed 0.59 294% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 133 Write 131 Mixed 117 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.16 59% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 955GB free Firmware: 0911 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 71.1 Write 90.8 Mixed 59.3 55% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.36 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.53 241% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 669GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897091769 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2289 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10040 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2198 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2296 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2296 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 227634708515 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.4% Good	Read 154 Write 88.3 Mixed 115 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.15 69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 506GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12897026233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1752 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7769 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1604 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1757 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1757 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 214749806626 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53.2% Above average	Read 117 Write 68.3 Mixed 85.5 68% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.18 59% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MR[A/B]4U266GHHF8G 4x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.5% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 22 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.6 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)