Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 19:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 116
50% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 375
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1667 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 8.23
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 56
7% 42.1 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 49
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
36GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 375
Mixed 407
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 41.8
149% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 98.7
105% 176 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 134%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 363
Write 92.7
Mixed 148
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 12.9
67% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.9
41% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback