HP p6751c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6751c (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 00:23
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 830 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 82.6 45% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 156 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 271GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2250 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 42 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 70 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 77 (C2) HDA temperature 111 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.1% Very good	Read 114 Write 133 Mixed 102 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.26 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.37 143% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3958 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5411 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25285 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1143 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5266 (C2) HDA temperature 108 101 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 18% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 16.2 Mixed 23.1 28% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 1.35 134% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G133381 PSD34G133381 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6751c

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)