Foxconn A75M

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Foxconn A75M (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110923
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 11:30
Run Duration	386 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3670 APU 2,400 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 51.7 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 71 34% 53 Pts	4-Core 95.5 8-Core 96.3 13% 95.9 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D 4,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(105B 0D7E) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.84 3% 3.68 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 4.43 3% 3.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17452 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7045 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 1 (AD) Unknown 100 100 262 (AE) Unknown 100 100 87 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 873 (E8) Unknown 96 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1357 (F1) Unknown 100 100 33531647736 (F2) Unknown 100 100 47790066718	22.6% Poor	Read 331 Write 19 Mixed 66.2 29% 139 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 3.81 29% 8.12 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 495GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897157306 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 13127 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16872 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7057 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 13128 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 13128 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 210454315031 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.4% Excellent	Read 136 Write 158 Mixed 31.2 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.21 73% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 107%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 233GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 89 100939631 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13545 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 23 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 343423283 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 39676 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9441 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 14313 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 47 3071322161177 (C2) HDA temperature 25 53 60129542169 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 75 49 21108013 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	43.1% Average	Read 74.3 Write 75.9 Mixed 17.5 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.39 91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 357GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 31 Write 30.7 Mixed 6.81 27% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.24 60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 21%
Mass Storage Device 268GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 250GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.49% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 5.19 Mixed 3.8 9% 9.24 MB/s	4K Read 2.67 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.002 10% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 2x4GB 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A75M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A75M

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
0 @ 9D7TBNZB-TATP 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16