Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive852% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 788
72% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 196
Parallax 195
149% 191 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 177
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
440GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 506
Mixed 796
179% 811 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 26
118% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 65.4
117% 219 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 125%
Great: 182%
Apple SM256E 251GB
227GB free
Firmware: 7A1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 475
Write 355
Mixed 398
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 23.6
101% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 76.2
97% 181 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
852% Outstanding
Read 5,589
Write 4,896
Mixed 4,998
1,151% 5,161 MB/s
4K Read 365
4K Write 287
4K Mixed 241
1,013% 298 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 240
262% 443 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 852%
Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
152GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,706
Write 1,237
Mixed 1,207
307% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 45.7
220% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 671
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 260
283% 478 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 235%
Great: 236%
Plextor M6e PCIe M.2 256GB-$208
148GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 381
Write 309
Mixed 345
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 37.8
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 107
132% 237 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
51GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M2A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M2A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 42.5
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 21.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback