Asus K53SV

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus K53SV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K53SV
Memory	4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 09:49
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 158 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 377 43% 334 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15F2) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.66 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 79987477	86% Excellent	Read 499 Write 402 Mixed 417 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 38.2 107% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 68.7 76% 131 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 134%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13 3,792 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 9GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 85.4 Write 6.33 Mixed 30.2 38% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.34 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.63 58% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SSZ302G08-GDJEC 06C1 SSA302G08-GDJEC 6GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	137x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	136x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	125x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	396x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	174x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	13x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	33x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	32x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 1x4GBAsintBench 27%, 631 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16