HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 98% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory3.7 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime31.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 01:48
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%
CPU Throttled 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 44.7
23% 35.6 Pts
4-Core 56.2
8-Core 92
9% 74.1 Pts
64-Core 78.4
5% 78.4 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
MSI(1462 1020) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.78
2% 1.68 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 0.61
1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Nvidia NVS 300
HP(103C 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.72
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS120G32TND-N1A2A 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 191
Write 137
Mixed 132
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 13.1
63% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 14.2
18% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
465GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 83.1
Write 73
Mixed 83.5
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.39
103% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback