Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110715
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 21:43
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31270
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 486
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 33
Parallax 40
40% 40.9 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 43
Splatting 38.4
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
432GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 159
Write 140
Mixed 106
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.29
109% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 79
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.25
97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Generic External 1TB
115GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.2
Mixed 16.5
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.21
65% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback