Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z170X-UD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180111
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 19:25
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400T 8,631 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 152 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 261 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.63 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 4.97 4% 5.25 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 1.65 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 449GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,554 Write 1,072 Mixed 1,151 279% 1,259 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 28.1 125% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 45.4 DQ Write 96.2 DQ Mixed 63.5 50% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 170% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 276%
Samsung 960 EVO 500GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,364 Write 1,025 Mixed 1,073 256% 1,154 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 20.5 114% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 22.1 44% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 242%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB 15,450 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z170X-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	243x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	179x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	94x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	56x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	52x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16