Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 23:01
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 88.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 247 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 983 87% 738 Pts	64-Core 1,319 82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Lighting 98.9 Reflection 88.3 Parallax 181 81% 123 fps	MRender 84.9 Gravity 114 Splatting 125 91% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 419GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 725 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 302 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 649503184	91.7% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 416 Mixed 420 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 26.7 145% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 42.7 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 24.5 30% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 387GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1480 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 880 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 177 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7261052796	109% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 408 Mixed 412 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 45.5 165% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 24.8 87% 193 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,530 Write 1,784 Mixed 1,835 454% 2,050 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 36 202% 78.6 MB/s	DQ Read 48.5 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 35.2 44% 75 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 353%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 169 4508 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2322 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2888 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1587 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 215 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 29899 (C2) HDA temperature 122 109 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.4% Very good	Read 132 Write 113 Mixed 116 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96 4,081 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3334 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 46.1 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 34 115% 40.1 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 43.1 SC Mixed 32.2 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	25x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	19x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX300 SATA M.2 1TBCrucial $65Bench 90%, 6,111 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	5x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16