Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 79.2 46% 68.7 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 156 22% 160 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.6% Below average	Lighting 42.7 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 51.8 35% 44.4 fps	MRender 54 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 37 37% 46.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc SSD110 120GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 28208498 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -89541478170284 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3404 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 424 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 28208498 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 28208498 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 28208498 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18348 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20183 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20183 (F2) Unknown 0 0 35671	45.4% Average	Read 372 Write 100 Mixed 146 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 9.9 64% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 36.3 52% 98 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 307GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 182 3850 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 665 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3292 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 663 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 642 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.2% Very good	Read 124 Write 142 Mixed 86 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.88 4K Mixed 0.36 120% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 296GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 164 1216 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4951 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23017 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4534 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 451 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 148540 (C2) HDA temperature 119 101 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 8 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 72.5 Write 74.7 Mixed 4.43 36% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.19 49% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 67%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 33GB free Firmware: VM100-50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 5760 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 15018 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 33569 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7974 (BB) vendor-specific 87 87 14 (BE) vendor-specific 154 91 28 (C2) HDA temperature 154 91 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 15213 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 4740 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 20	22.8% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 41.8 Mixed 35.3 29% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.25 63% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB 4,484 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	19x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	10x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	3x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	2x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16