MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 00:12
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 291
100% 180 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 849
88% 710 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3711) ≥ 4GB; XTtreme Gaming
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 161
Parallax 138
120% 149 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 148
Splatting 118
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
173GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 479
Mixed 465
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 33.2
148% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 43
73% 133 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
160GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 484
Write 335
Mixed 338
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 22.8
110% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 37.1
75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 95%
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 1,479
Mixed 1,379
364% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 53.8
203% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 49.8
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 108
101% 148 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 243%
Great: 381%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
522GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 163
Write 130
Mixed 137
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 113%
Lexar microSD RDR 64GB
46GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 91.3
Write 64.7
Mixed 63
89% 73 MB/s
4K Read 9.94
4K Write 3.55
4K Mixed 2.43
240% 5.31 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$5
25GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 123
Write 48.6
Mixed 66.8
89% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.73
81% 2.85 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,073
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback