Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 20:58
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 144 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 462 42% 354 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Gigabyte(1458 22C8) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1430 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 61.9 44% 56.6 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 48.1 Splatting 38.1 36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4109 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 659 (B1) Unknown 97 97 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 160 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10497527885	69.2% Good	Read 414 Write 322 Mixed 317 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 16.8 107% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 16.6 20% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 158 158 34387788073 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 428 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 850 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 278 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 433 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 433 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210454511651 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	104% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 191 Mixed 141 126% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 717GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 87 93976248 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1171 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 55 584285969315 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13906 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 925 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4887 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295229446 (BD) vendor-specific 72 72 28 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 30620188705 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 315 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 57 57 87051 (C2) HDA temperature 33 46 -140737488355295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 35351875824279 (F1) Unknown 100 253 127159031863 (F2) Unknown 100 253 58233014848	84.6% Excellent	Read 137 Write 158 Mixed 131 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 4x8GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16