| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141209 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 12 '18 at 11:59 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
84% 147 Pts
|
62% 500 Pts
|
37% 603 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
104%
Outstanding
|
111% 137 fps
|
93% 115 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS1J.8FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.2%
Above average
|
58% 20.1 GB/s
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
70% 56.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 108x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 56x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 36x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 35x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |