User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 08:19
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 161
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 842
69% 604 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 113
Parallax 188
60% 125 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 176
Splatting 124
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 420
Mixed 346
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 28.6
120% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 110
118% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 106%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 142
Write 94.1
Mixed 90.5
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.13
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 18.5
63% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 49.1
Write 87
Mixed 44.7
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.38
89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 72%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 8.2
55% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.22
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 92%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
5GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 69.1
Write 89.6
Mixed 26.3
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.71
161% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 69%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 18.1
Mixed 21.8
30% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.54
47% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 39.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback