Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '18 at 18:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 848
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
237GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 329
Mixed 395
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 35.3
146% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 54.3
96% 184 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2,037
Write 1,029
Mixed 1,157
310% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 43.7
198% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 200
219% 370 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 224%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
747GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 159
Mixed 159
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.36
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.29
133% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
465GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 115
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.45
114% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
781GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 42.9
Mixed 18.9
42% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.37
74% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.1% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 17.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 11.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback