Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 21:32
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 498 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 21.6 16% 19.7 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 19 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTTAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19250 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1455 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 296 (C2) HDA temperature 62 26 317828169766 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	96.1% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 459 Mixed 477 107% 479 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 31.2 114% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 201 175% 259 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 92%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60 2,404 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 95GB free Firmware: 0303 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 112316490 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1152 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 45054695 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15214 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1094 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 40 223792660507 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 26 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 343935 (C2) HDA temperature 27 60 25769803803 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 38 112316490 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	29.9% Poor	Read 50 Write 54 Mixed 45.7 38% 49.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.19 54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,045 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16