Asus StrikerExtreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus StrikerExtreme  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$191
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.4% Poor
SC Int 43.1
SC Float 27.1
SC Mixed 34.1
28% 34.8 Pts
QC Int 127
QC Float 94.7
QC Mixed 134
27% 119 Pts
MC Int 158
MC Float 129
MC Mixed 122
21% 136 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Lighting 135
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 132
42% 115 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 126
Splatting 57.8
33% 73.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$42
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.9% Below average
Read 206
Write 116
Mixed 160
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 5.76
59% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 4.43
9% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
92GB free
Firmware: 04.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 88.6
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.41
104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 63%
WD WD7500AYPS-01ZKB0 750GB
45GB free
Firmware: 02.0
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 53.2
Write 46.7
Mixed 50.5
38% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.26
82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical StrikerExtreme Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus StrikerExtreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $225Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $770Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback