Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 10:16
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 370 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.1 Reflection 14 Parallax 18.9 12% 15.7 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 20.5 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 5 0 5 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17676 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1881 (E8) Unknown 100 100 25905386169 (E9) Unknown 95 0 95	78% Very good	Read 355 Write 387 Mixed 322 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 24.9 113% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 97.7 DQ Mixed 56 64% 113 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 749GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 189322576 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7921 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 128510929 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3115 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 18 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 578 (BE) vendor-specific 67 43 22029533217 (C2) HDA temperature 33 57 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 35 23 189322576 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -1589137881063 (F1) Unknown 100 253 442661450 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1913888433	47.7% Average	Read 67.4 Write 98.8 Mixed 21.9 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.29 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 70%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 377GB free Firmware: CV11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 64 96797964 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1381 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 79330201 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 25894357831233 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 58 470745113 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 743 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3269 (C2) HDA temperature 25 42 55834574873 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 103165114450538 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7885611891 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1561589836	58.8% Above average	Read 92.2 Write 112 Mixed 68.5 68% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.29 95% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 285GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 77 127236328 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3185 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 184 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12261928 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8592 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 438 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2934 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 504299550 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 31879 (C2) HDA temperature 30 47 55834574878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -124000000799096 (F1) Unknown 100 253 20612476080 (F2) Unknown 100 253 49917483459	63.5% Good	Read 108 Write 113 Mixed 78 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.21 68% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 1x8GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	49x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	48x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16