Lenovo 349742G

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 349742G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121221
Uptime	9.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	1463 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330S 4,454 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 39.7 20% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 95.4 8-Core 150 15% 123 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 308C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2752 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.55 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.48 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 13 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1542 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 43 (64) Unknown 100 100 1124656 (65) Unknown 100 100 75824 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 488 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 830 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 124555296797 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 13 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 13 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2978 (EA) Unknown 100 100 664 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1761 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2726 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 91	37.5% Below average	Read 255 Write 126 Mixed 111 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 9.19 56% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 24.6 32% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 128GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 78GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.88% Terrible	Read 32.1 Write 1.61 Mixed 27.5 23% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.06 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.76 72% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 37%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 3.59 Mixed 5.19 8% 7.56 MB/s	4K Read 3.29 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 12GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Read 31.4 Write 4.51 Mixed 9.98 15% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.28 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.28 30% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 1x4GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 349742G

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)