ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator G9-793 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Challenger2_SKS
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 00:27
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 224 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 582 60% 483 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 123 Parallax 95.2 83% 107 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 98.3 Splatting 107 82% 98.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,689 Write 1,413 Mixed 1,419 405% 1,840 MB/s	4K Read 51.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 43.1 190% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 125 139% 237 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 254%
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB 9,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 119GB free Firmware: G871201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (B1) Unknown 100 100 16348 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 17 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12546 (F2) Unknown 100 100 31376	76.9% Very good	Read 511 Write 173 Mixed 259 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 31.5 119% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 69.6 91% 166 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 724GB free Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1718 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1274 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 124 (0A) Spinup retry count 125 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 124 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1722 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188979085342 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 85 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 190 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	56.3% Above average	Read 98.9 Write 97.5 Mixed 93.3 73% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.16 57% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 62%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 931GB free, PID 25fe Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 114 Write 105 Mixed 76.1 122% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.71 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.37 118% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 12.9 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	310x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	207x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	447x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	79x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples	1x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	86x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	47x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	45x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	112x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	101x
ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 566 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback