Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+ 2,693 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.24% Terrible	Memory 8.57 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 60.5 16% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 57.1 8-Core 56.8 8% 56.9 Pts	64-Core 58.9 4% 58.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.24% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 57.1 Mixed 55.5 44% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.37 82% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 41%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB 890 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 109GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 18.6 Write 18.1 Mixed 12.1 20% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.28 49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.16% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 417 10% 417 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.16% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	5x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	10x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	6x
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	4x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16