| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130823 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '18 at 23:52 |
| Run Duration | 81 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.8%
Very good
|
70% 118 Pts
|
44% 333 Pts
|
21% 342 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
21.4%
Poor
|
21% 28.6 fps
|
22% 26.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
75% 99.7 MB/s
|
126% 0.79 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.1%
Above average
|
56% 19.8 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,102 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 1,181x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 501x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 489x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 565x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 477x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 413x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $287 |