Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '18 at 16:17
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 296 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 814 80% 655 Pts	64-Core 833 52% 833 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 26.3 Reflection 161 Parallax 139 21% 109 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 150 Splatting 116 105% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 476GB free Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,302 Write 800 Mixed 867 219% 990 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 37.1 136% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 115 132% 230 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 237%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,948 Write 820 Mixed 928 270% 1,232 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 38.1 132% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 108 122% 213 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 237%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6945 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4047 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3095 (0A) Spinup retry count 180 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2119 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 853 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 845 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4647 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044511772 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1761 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 542 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 294GB free Firmware: 3.AAJ Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 91 233201328 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5876 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 321331618 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5514 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 45 504692766 (C2) HDA temperature 30 55 77309411358 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 71 57 157724247 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 14 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 252 1	44.9% Average	Read 77.6 Write 78.6 Mixed 72.8 57% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.38 95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 33.1 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 45.8 SC Mixed 32 97% 33.8 GB/s	Latency 51.7 77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,156x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	177x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	339x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	91x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	81x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16