Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '18 at 17:29
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 208 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 701 69% 567 Pts	64-Core 894 55% 894 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 66 Parallax 64.3 16% 49.9 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 52.7 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 130GB free Firmware: MU02.6 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 459 Write 251 Mixed 265 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 23.3 94% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 46.4 70% 134 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 421 Mixed 477 105% 470 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 38.6 133% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 135 152% 259 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 101GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 472 Write 333 Mixed 339 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 24 91% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 44.3 78% 154 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46.4 MC Write 46.3 MC Mixed 44.8 131% 45.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 22 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	761x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16