HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory	13 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 17:15
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 151 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 536 48% 408 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 335.23 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 19.7 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 16.7 16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 2,059 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 115GB free Firmware: O061 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 207 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1234 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 42 (A3) Unknown 100 100 3 (A4) Unknown 100 100 53034 (A5) Unknown 100 100 117 (A6) Unknown 100 100 10 (A7) Unknown 100 100 52 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 82 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 30 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 219 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 67895 (F2) Unknown 100 100 32993 (F5) Unknown 100 100 212136	49.2% Average	Read 267 Write 121 Mixed 184 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 26.7 76% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 61.5 70% 122 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5053 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 979 (B1) Unknown 98 98 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6012572797	65.6% Good	Read 267 Write 213 Mixed 139 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 34 110% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 86.2 85% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 144GB free Firmware: JP1O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 100 90 (03) Spinup time 115 100 17192911048 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2031 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 100 32 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9836 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1680 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 68 21759123 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 371130399 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2085 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2085 (C2) HDA temperature 193 150 176094445599 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	72.3% Very good	Read 125 Write 128 Mixed 8.83 62% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.43 99% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 75%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 748GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 25.1 Mixed 26.8 34% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.09 38% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB 50GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	251x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16