ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	empty empty
Motherboard	TYAN S7010
Memory	44.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 15:52
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 158 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 484 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8233) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Lighting 7.17 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 2.44 6% 5.64 fps	MRender 6.95 Gravity 5.93 Splatting 6 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 60GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5013 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1226 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 45 (AD) Unknown 100 100 86966561 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6212382	35.2% Below average	Read 213 Write 86 Mixed 64.1 26% 121 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 5.45 71% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 47.9 DQ Mixed 5.52 13% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 68%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 16GB free Firmware: 03.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 181 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4736 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 18 18 60177 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3229 (BE) vendor-specific 69 42 31 (C2) HDA temperature 116 89 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 22 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	23.7% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 38.2 Mixed 34.1 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.35 92% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 35%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 16GB free Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7299 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24936 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3279 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 108558 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 56 738656276 (C2) HDA temperature 77 54 772210711 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 108558 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	29.9% Poor	Read 47.4 Write 56.6 Mixed 51 39% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.32 73% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 42%
WD WD1200JS-00MHB0 120GB 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 5GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 182 3683 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6576 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13596 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5446 (BE) vendor-specific 72 1 28 (C2) HDA temperature 119 1 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2224 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	21.5% Poor	Read 37.2 Write 37.1 Mixed 36.8 28% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.46 117% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 6x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 6 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.4% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 19.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback