| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A2 |
| Memory | 115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170519 |
| Uptime | 9.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 30 '18 at 11:54 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | ARE-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
77% 138 Pts
|
71% 576 Pts
|
108% 1,745 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 388.16
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
103% 128 fps
|
90% 110 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
111% 148 MB/s
|
118% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
75.2%
Very good
|
81% 28.5 GB/s
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
49% 81.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |