| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Toshiba Satellite C650D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100902 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 29 '18 at 04:57 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II P340-$50
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
35.9%
Below average
|
33% 44.8 Pts
|
8% 56.2 Pts
|
4% 63 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
0.3%
Terrible
|
0% 0.53 fps
|
0% 0.45 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingdian S200 60GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0919A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
54% 240 MB/s
|
34% 12.3 MB/s
|
29% 65.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 Samsung M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
|
20.1%
Poor
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
15% 5.27 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite C650D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II P320AMD $20Bench 34%, 3,972 samples | 7x |
| V120AMDBench 33%, 586 samples | 5x |
| E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples | 16x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $48 |