ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo W880CU

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Clevo W880CU (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO W880CU
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 12:34
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core X 920-$90 79 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 129 64% 101 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 274 29% 231 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M 34 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Clevo(1558 8687) 2GB CLim: 425 MHz, MLim: 600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	9.29% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 11.6 9% 12.9 fps	MRender 17.5 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 12.3 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.29% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM09B1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8376 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4035 (B1) Unknown 88 88 558 (B2) Unknown 71 71 294 (BE) vendor-specific 60 53 40 (EB) Unknown 99 99 533	28.7% Poor	Read 242 Write 148 Mixed 182 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 8.78 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 5.07 31% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 9 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 5.06 8% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 43%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60 4,559 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 438GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 168 2475 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2795 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2892 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2774 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 306 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 65 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17864 (C2) HDA temperature 111 92 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 97 97 2855 (F1) Unknown 200 200 5729664604 (F2) Unknown 200 200 13205985787 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	57.7% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.8 Mixed 93.4 74% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.42 110% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSFF65F-C8KM9 2x4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback