AMD R690A-M2T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	BIOSTAR R690A-M2T
Motherboard	AMD R690A-M2T (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '18 at 10:10
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 784 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 17.8 2-Core 29.3 11% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 37.4 8-Core 41.6 5% 39.5 Pts	64-Core 50.9 3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 17% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200 Series AMD(1002 791E) 128MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.21 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 163 2716 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 199 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35555 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 199 (BE) vendor-specific 60 51 40 (C2) HDA temperature 103 94 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.4% Below average	Read 52.1 Write 53.4 Mixed 26.5 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.39 90% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 49 45 200781649 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2116 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 503860508 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13647 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 923 (C2) HDA temperature 38 52 81604378662 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 45 200781649 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	27% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 46.9 Mixed 25.2 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.33 66% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.64% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 928 4% 928 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

AMD R690A-M2T

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)