| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160324 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '18 at 00:46 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.2%
Good
|
62% 98.4 Pts
|
36% 292 Pts
|
23% 367 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
19% 26.7 fps
|
22% 25.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
|
31.9%
Below average
|
28% 9.97 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
63% 63.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 424x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 386x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $344 |