Asus A88X-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	67.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus A88X-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150429
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 23:40
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 122 51% 85 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 194 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.1% Good	Lighting 74.7 Reflection 107 Parallax 86.2 61% 89.3 fps	MRender 95.8 Gravity 98 Splatting 96.6 79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2965 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1054 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 945 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2883697 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 70 (C2) HDA temperature 67 47 227634249761 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 10104 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7765 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5022 (F4) Unknown 100 100 44 (F5) Unknown 100 100 113 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3053504	88.9% Excellent	Read 508 Write 468 Mixed 494 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 14 103% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 14.1 71% 162 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 930GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 140909431 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1454 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 84153 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1048 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 538181663 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1825 (C2) HDA temperature 31 10 42949672991 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 1 140909431 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -16574278794570 (F1) Unknown 100 253 96887923 (F2) Unknown 100 253 44021508	98.1% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 162 Mixed 147 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 105 Write 89 Mixed 20.2 82% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.16 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 535GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 95.5 Mixed 30.7 86% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.17 61% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 16GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 14.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.7 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88X-GAMER Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-GAMER

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	16x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	11x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	4x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
F3-2400C10-4GTX 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 188 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16