Acer Switch SW312-31

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAcer Switch SW312-31  (all builds)
MotherboardAPL Tahiti_S
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 14:33
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.4% Below average
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 99.8
35% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 180
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 146
10% 146 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hynix HCG4a2 63GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Read 286
Write 152
Mixed 198
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 3.47
58% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 3.49
13% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 53%
ZALMAN External HDD 1TB
291GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 79
Write 75.8
Mixed 55.9
88% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.53
83% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 26%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Switch SW312-31 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Switch SW312-31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback