Asus ET2411_W8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus ET2411_W8 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ET2411_W8
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '18 at 23:30
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2130-$50 6,759 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 226 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0102) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.18 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TP00500GB 500GB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 176 2166 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 32 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 32 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 12 (C2) HDA temperature 118 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	90% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 143 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.53 4K Write 4.47 4K Mixed 0.41 192% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZPHSCG Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET2411_W8 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2411_W8

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	4x
Core i3-2130Intel $50Bench 57%, 6,759 samples	4x
Pentium G640Intel $30Bench 48%, 3,040 samples	4x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	7x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	3x

SSD
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TBBench 74%, 12,882 samples	1x
WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TBWDCBench 35%, 20,788 samples	1x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GBSamsungBench 41%, 672 samples	2x
HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 42%, 1,547 samples	2x
HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GBHynixBench 41%, 2,250 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16