PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ZBook 15 (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 80D5 |
Memory | 23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161101 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '18 at 19:16 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
HP(103C 810A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.78
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
174%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples | 225x |
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 85x |
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples | 42x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples | 153x |
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples | 117x |
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 106x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $150 |