Asus X205TA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus X205TA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X205TA
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141006
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 16:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 14.9
2-Core 29.9
28% 35.8 Pts
4-Core 58.3
8-Core 58.6
8% 58.4 Pts
64-Core 57.6
4% 57.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 18CD) 1,024MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.81 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4e 31GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
Read 147
Write 51
Mixed 77
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 4.04
4K Mixed 2.76
707% 4.87 MB/s
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
58GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 13.4
Mixed 15.2
23% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.75
93% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback