HP RK562AA-ABD m7694.de

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP RK562AA-ABD m7694.de (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Basswood
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060918
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 13:50
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 51.1 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 42.5 27% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 29 8-Core 44.9 5% 37 Pts	64-Core 47.5 3% 47.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600 19 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 0400) 512MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.23% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 283GB free Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13012 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 311823912 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9826 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 706674730 (C2) HDA temperature 42 50 77309411370 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 77 59 43743257 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	41.3% Average	Read 72.7 Write 71.1 Mixed 29.2 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.43 96% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12493 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 156875864 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9826 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 51 756875309 (C2) HDA temperature 45 49 77309411373 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 69 59 232931134 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.5% Below average	Read 59 Write 57.9 Mixed 37 38% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.01 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.09 12% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 44%
WD 2500JB External 250GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 230GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 23.3 Mixed 13.2 26% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.4 75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 18%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 9.57 Mixed 14.3 20% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.51 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.81 69% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x0.5GB 2,291 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP RK562AA-ABD m7694.de

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)