Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16F4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT60 2OC/2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-16F4  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 21:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 90
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 470
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
MSI(1462 10E8) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 24.1
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 24
Splatting 18.7
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 376 387 402 426 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 476
Write 417
Mixed 380
SusWrite 387
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 21
98% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 30.3
73% 148 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S8G-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.6" 1280 720 LGD0259
Typical MS-16F4 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback