Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 21:18
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 877
88% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 166
Parallax 388
135% 240 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 129
Splatting 197
170% 211 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2764 2822 2226 1764 1498 1358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 3,481
Write 3,053
Mixed 2,417
SusWrite 2,072
618% 2,756 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 58.7
197% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 1,169
DQ Mixed 1,069
814% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 376%
Great: 573%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
222GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1611 1754 725 287 285 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,554
Write 1,761
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 824
326% 1,445 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 59
189% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 968
733% 988 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 216%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
397GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 425 431 415 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 444
Mixed 425
SusWrite 425
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 44
143% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 220
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
451GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 163 163 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 144
Mixed 105
SusWrite 162
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
6TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 177 178 177 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 216
Mixed 143
SusWrite 177
251% 187 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.2
421% 6.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 1.7
316% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.5
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.1
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 19% 42 188 19 144 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F66 BenQ EX3203R
Typical GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback